Low-Dose Triple Pill vs Monotherapy for Hypertension
PUBLISHED:

Single-pill low-dose combination (LDC) therapy is an emerging strategy for improving blood pressure (BP) control in patients with hypertension.¹ Two new phase III trials, HM-APOLLO-301 and HM-APOLLO-302, have evaluated the efficacy and safety of an ultra-low-dose triple combination pill compared with standard-dose monotherapy as an initial treatment for mild-to-moderate hypertension.

Methodology

The HM-APOLLO-301 and HM-APOLLO-302 studies were multicentre, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled trials conducted in South Korea. They enrolled adults with mild-to-moderate hypertension, defined as a systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 140 to <180 mmHg and a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of <110 mmHg, following a 4-week placebo run-in period.

In HM-APOLLO-301, patients were randomised to receive either a single-pill LDC containing 1.67mg amlodipine, 16.67mg losartan potassium, and 4.17mg chlorthalidone (LDC-ALC) or standard-dose 5mg amlodipine monotherapy. In HM-APOLLO-302, patients received either LDC-ALC or standard-dose 50mg losartan potassium monotherapy. The primary endpoint for both trials was the reduction in SBP from baseline after 8 weeks of treatment.

Results

In the HM-APOLLO-301 trial, the LDC-ALC pill was noninferior to amlodipine monotherapy in reducing SBP at week 8. The least-squares mean change from baseline was −19.1 mmHg for the LDC-ALC group versus −19.9mmHg for the amlodipine group (95% CI: −1.5 to 3.1; p=0.495). Reductions in DBP and overall BP control rates were also similar between the two groups.

In the HM-APOLLO-302 trial, the LDC-ALC pill was found to be both noninferior and superior to losartan monotherapy for SBP reduction. The least-squares mean change from baseline was −19.9 mmHg with LDC-ALC compared to −16.4mmHg with losartan (95% CI: −6.6 to −0.2; p=0.037). The LDC-ALC group also demonstrated greater DBP reduction and a higher BP control rate.

Across both studies, the safety profiles were comparable. The incidence of adverse events was 11.7% for LDC-ALC versus 13.9% for amlodipine, and 6.4% for LDC-ALC versus 3.3% for losartan. Treatment withdrawal rates were low (≤1%), and no serious drug-related adverse events were reported.

In Practice

The study authors concluded that, “Single-pill LDC-ALC achieved BP reductions similar to those with amlodipine and greater than those with losartan monotherapy over 8 weeks, with similar short-term tolerability.” These findings suggest that this low-dose triple combination therapy is an effective and well-tolerated alternative for the initial treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension, offering a new option alongside established monotherapies.

This study was funded by Hanmi Pharmaceutical Co.

Disclaimer

The information presented in this article is for educational purposes only. Any quotes included reflect the opinions of the individual quoted, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher. The publisher does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the content and accepts no responsibility for any errors, or any consequences arising from its use.

References

1. Sung KC, Park K, Kim DH, et al. Single-pill low-dose triple combination therapy vs standard-dose monotherapy in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2026; [Epub ahead of print]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2025.12.028

2. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants. Lancet. 2021;398:957-980. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01330-1

Share: